A Step-by-Step Guide to Writing a Review Paper in Medical Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71354/ijthpe.03.01.48Keywords:
Medical Education, Peer Review, Manuscript Submission, Reviewer Feedback, Academic PublishingAbstract
Review articles are foundation tasks in medical education since they synthesize current knowledge, establish best practice, and identify research gaps. However, the majority of researchers and postgraduate students face immense challenges when they attempt to compose their first review article. Common mistakes vary from selecting an appropriate topic, navigating through massive literature databases, synthesizing divergent sources, and presenting findings in an academic format. This step-by-step guides explain on how to write a review paper by providing a structured, easy-to-follow approach for medical education areas. The guide begins by explaining how to choose a focused and relevant topic that is both within the author's scope of expertise and of urgent need in the field. It continues by outlining the key distinctions between different type of reviews such as narrative, systematic, and scoping reviews to help researchers to fulfil their objectives. Subsequent chapters discuss on approaches for conducting efficient literature searches, critically appraising sources, and synthesising information thematically. Special emphasis is placed on synthesizing findings into a coherent argument while maintaining academic integrity. This paper also addresses common mistakes such as managing the scope of the review, preventing plagiarism through proper citation conventions, and selecting appropriate journals to which to submit. Step-by-step guidance is provided on how to structure the manuscript, refine academic writing style, and respond to peer reviewer criticisms. This manuscript aims to build confidence among researchers and finally empowers beginners to produce quality, publishable reviews that contribute impactfully to the medical education research and practice community.
Downloads
References
Ajjawi, R. and Kent, F. (2022) 'Understanding realist reviews for medical education', Journal of graduate medical education, 14(3), 274-278.
Bahadoran, Z., Mirmiran, P., Kashfi, K. and Ghasemi, A. (2021) 'Scientific publishing in biomedicine: how to write a cover letter?', International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 19(3), e115242.
Bahji, A., Acion, L., Laslett, A.-M. and Adinoff, B. (2023) 'Exclusion of the non-English-speaking world from the scientific literature: Recommendations for change for addiction journals and publishers', Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 40(1), 6-13.
Booth, A., Martyn-St James, M., Clowes, M. and Sutton, A. (2021) 'Systematic approaches to a successful literature review'.
Chan, C. K. and Lee, K. K. (2021) 'Reflection literacy: A multilevel perspective on the challenges of using reflections in higher education through a comprehensive literature review', Educational Research Review, 32, 100376.
Chigbu, U. E., Atiku, S. O. and Du Plessis, C. C. (2023) 'The science of literature reviews: Searching, identifying, selecting, and synthesising', Publications, 11(1), 2.
Cooper, C., Booth, A., Varley-Campbell, J., Britten, N. and Garside, R. (2018) 'Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies', BMC medical research methodology, 18, 1-14.
Cronin, M. A. and George, E. (2023) 'The why and how of the integrative review', Organizational research methods, 26(1), 168-192.
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S. and Giri, R. A. (2021) 'Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms', Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36.
Drozdz, J. A. and Ladomery, M. R. (2024) 'The peer review process: past, present, and future', British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81, 12054.
Eriksen, M. B. and Frandsen, T. F. (2018) 'The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review', Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 420.
Ferrari, R. (2015) 'Writing narrative style literature reviews', Medical writing, 24(4), 230-235.
Hidouri, S., Kamoun, H., Salah, S., Jellad, A. and Saad, H. B. (2024) 'Key guidelines for responding to reviewers', F1000Research, 13, 921.
Hoffecker, L. (2020) 'Grey literature searching for systematic reviews in the health sciences', The Serials Librarian, 79(3-4), 252-260.
Jackson, J. L. and Kuriyama, A. (2019) 'How often do systematic reviews exclude articles not published in English?', Journal of general internal medicine, 34, 1388-1389.
Jha, R., Sondhi, V. and Vasudevan, B. (2022) 'Literature search: Simple rules for confronting the unknown', medical journal armed forces india, 78, S14-S23.
Kaufman, D. M. (2018) 'Teaching and learning in medical education: how theory can inform practice', Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice, 37-69.
Kratochvíl, J. (2017) 'Comparison of the accuracy of bibliographical references generated for medical citation styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero', The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(1), 57-66.
Kushnir, I. (2025) 'Thematic analysis in the area of education: a practical guide', Cogent Education, 12(1), 2471645.
Lim, W. M., Kumar, S. and Ali, F. (2022) 'Advancing knowledge through literature reviews:‘what’,‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’', The Service Industries Journal, 42(7-8), 481-513.
Lindsay, D. (2020) Scientific writing= thinking in words, Csiro Publishing.
Liu, Q. (2024) 'The dilemmas of transport equity research in non-Western contexts', Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 26, 101157.
Luft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R. and Gardner, G. (2022) 'Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction for new biology education researchers', CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(3), rm33.
Luong, V., Bearman, M. and MacLeod, A. (2023) 'Understanding meta-ethnography in health professions education research', Journal of graduate medical education, 15(1), 40-45.
Majumder, M. A. A., Haque, M. and Razzaque, M. S. (2023) 'Trends and challenges of medical education in the changing academic and public health environment of the 21st century', Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1153764.
Mattos, S. M., Cestari, V. R. F. and Moreira, T. M. M. (2023) 'Scoping protocol review: PRISMA-ScR guide refinement', Rev Enferm UFPI, 12(1).
Mc Grath-Lone, L., Jay, M. A., Blackburn, R., Gordon, E., Zylbersztejn, A., Wijlaars, L. and Gilbert, R. (2022) 'What makes administrative data “research-ready”? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature', International Journal of Population Data Science, 7(1), 1718.
McGowan, J., Straus, S., Moher, D., Langlois, E. V., O’Brien, K. K., Horsley, T., Aldcroft, A., Zarin, W., Garitty, C. M. and Hempel, S. (2020) 'Reporting scoping reviews-PRISMA ScR extension', J Clin Epidemiol, 123(177), e9.
Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R. and Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014) 'PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews', BMC health services research, 14(1), 1-10.
Morris, C., Deehan, J. and MacDonald, A. (2024) 'Written argumentation research in English and science: A scoping review', Cogent Education, 11(1), 2356983.
Moschis, G. P. (2024) 'Literature Reviews' in Academic Research in Business and the Social Sciences: A Guidebook for Early Career Researchers, Springer, 141-178.
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. and Aromataris, E. (2018) 'Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach', BMC medical research methodology, 18, 1-7.
Pant, R. R., Acharya, K. P., Bishwakarma, K. and Awasthi, M. P. (2023) 'Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper', Curriculum Development Journal, 31(45), 148-166.
Parums, D. V. (2021) 'Review articles, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and the updated preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines', Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 27, e934475-1.
Peters, M. D., Marnie, C., Colquhoun, H., Garritty, C. M., Hempel, S., Horsley, T., Langlois, E. V., Lillie, E., O’Brien, K. K. and Tunçalp, Ӧ. (2021) 'Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application', Systematic reviews, 10, 1-6.
Pilkington, K., Boshnakova, A., Clarke, M. and Richardson, J. (2005) '" No language restrictions" in database searches: what does this really mean?', Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, 11(1), 205-207.
Rahman, H., Islam, M. S., Andrabi, S. M. H., Sharma, J. and Reza, N. (2024) 'Comparing the similarity index across iThenticate, Ouriginal, and Turnitin plagiarism detection software', Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 24(2), 419-424.
Ravinetto, R. and Singh, J. A. (2023) 'Responsible dissemination of health and medical research: some guidance points', BMJ evidence-based medicine, 28(3), 144-147.
Rosenfeld, R. M. (2010) 'How to review journal manuscripts', Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, 142(4), 472-486.
Ross-Hellauer, T., Tennant, J. P., Banelytė, V., Gorogh, E., Luzi, D., Kraker, P., Pisacane, L., Ruggieri, R., Sifacaki, E. and Vignoli, M. (2020) 'Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research', 16(4), e1007704.
Sadikan, M. Z. and Ariffin, I. A. (2024) 'Breaking Barriers, Building Bridges: A Review of Interprofessional Collaboration in Medical Education', International Journal of Transformative Health Professions Education, 2(1), 21-36.
Shaheen, N., Shaheen, A., Ramadan, A., Hefnawy, M. T., Ramadan, A., Ibrahim, I. A., Hassanein, M. E., Ashour, M. E. and Flouty, O. (2023) 'Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability', Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 8, 1268045.
Shreffler, J. and Huecker, M. (2022) 'Common Pitfalls In The Research Process. StatPearls',
Snyder, H. (2019) 'Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines', Journal of business research, 104, 333-339.
Sterpu, I., Herling, L., Nordquist, J., Rotgans, J. and Acharya, G. (2024) 'Team-based learning (TBL) in clinical disciplines for undergraduate medical students—a scoping review', BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 18.
Sukhera, J. (2022) 'Narrative reviews: flexible, rigorous, and practical', Journal of graduate medical education, 14(4), 414-417.
Tavakol, M. and O'Brien, D. (2023) 'The importance of crafting a good introduction to scholarly research: strategies for creating an effective and impactful opening statement', International Journal of Medical Education, 14, 84.
Zimba, O. and Gasparyan, A. (2021) 'Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers', Reumatologia/Rheumatology, 59(1), 3-8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Transformative Health Professions Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.